Sam Bankman-Fried took the witness stand to testify in his own defense on Friday at his fraud trial in New York on charges of looting billions of dollars in customer funds from his now-bankrupt FTX cryptocurrency exchange.
His testimony is set to mark the first time the 12 jurors and five alternates are hearing directly from the 31-year-old former billionaire after 12 trial days.
Prosecutors accuse Bankman-Fried of using FTX customer funds to prop up his crypto-focused hedge fund, Alameda Research, make speculative venture investments and donate more than $100 million to U.S. political campaigns. He also faces charges of scheming to cheat Alameda's lenders and FTX investors.
Prosecutors have said Bankman-Fried should not be allowed to suggest that the involvement of lawyers in decision-making showed he lacked criminal intent.
Kaplan said in an Oct. 1 court ruling that Bankman-Fried could confuse the jury if he presents evidence about FTX or Alameda lawyers' presence for certain decisions without specifying what the lawyers did and what they knew. He said he would decide on a "case-by-case basis" what Bankman-Fried could tell jurors about lawyers' presence and involvement.
Bankman-Fried's trial, which began on Oct. 3, is drawing to a close nearly a year after FTX collapsed amid a wave of customer withdrawals. The company declared bankruptcy in November 2022 and Bankman-Fried was indicted the following month.
Bankman-Fried said during questioning from defense lawyer Mark Cohen on Thursday that FTX's lawyers were involved in crafting its document-retention policies, setting up a system under which FTX customers deposited their funds into an Alameda bank account, and crafting loans that he and other executives took from Alameda.
On cross examination, Bankman-Fried, whose parents are both professors at Stanford Law School, rocked sided to side and often hedged his answers.
"I'm going to answer what I think the question you are asking is but I apologize if I am answering the wrong question," Bankman-Fried said at one point.
Kaplan remarked during the hearing that Bankman-Fried had "an interesting way of responding to questions."
Bankman-Fried said he believed Alameda was permitted to borrow from FTX in certain circumstances, but pushed back against the idea that he was using customer assets for his own purposes.
"That is not what I viewed to be happening so that is certainly not how I discussed it with attorneys," he said when asked whether he had discussed using FTX customer assets to buy rival exchange Binance's stake in FTX.
