• BUSINESS
    • FINANCE
    • LEGAL
    • RETAIL & CONSUMER
    • AUTOS & TRANSPORTATION
    • HEALTHCARE & PHARMACEUTICALS
    • MEDIA & TELECOM
    • AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE
    • ENERGY
  • MARKETS
    • EUROPEAN MARKETS
    • ASIAN MARKETS
    • U.S. MARKETS
    • COMMODITIES
    • EMERGING MARKETS
    • DEALS
    • RATES & BONDS
  • WORLD
    • UNITED STATES
    • EUROPE
    • UNITED KINGDOM
    • ASIA PACIFIC
    • MIDDLE EAST
    • AFRICA
    • CHINA
    • INDIA
    • JAPAN
    • AMERICAS
    • FRANCE
    • GERMANY
  • POLITICS
    • GOVERNMENT
    • UNITED STATES
    • US SUPREME COURT
  • TECH
    • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    • CYBERSECURITY
    • SPACE
    • DISRUPTED
  • COMMENTARY
  • BREAKINGVIEWS
    • BREAKINGVIEWS PREDICTIONS
  • MONEY
    • WEALTH
    • FUNDS
    • ETFS
  • LIFE
    • LIFESTYLE
    • SPORTS
    • SCIENCE
  • SECTORS
    • ENERGY
    • HEALTHCARE
    • MEDIA & TELECOM
    • SUSTAINABILITY
    • ENVIRONMENT
    • RETAIL & CONSUMER
    • AUTOS & TRANSPORTATION
    • AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE
FinanceTime
  • August 20th, 2026

FinanceTimeFinancetime

  • BUSINESS
    • FINANCE
    • LEGAL
    • RETAIL & CONSUMER
    • AUTOS & TRANSPORTATION
    • HEALTHCARE & PHARMACEUTICALS
    • MEDIA & TELECOM
    • AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE
    • ENERGY
  • MARKETS
    • EUROPEAN MARKETS
    • ASIAN MARKETS
    • U.S. MARKETS
    • COMMODITIES
    • EMERGING MARKETS
    • DEALS
    • RATES & BONDS
  • WORLD
    • UNITED STATES
    • EUROPE
    • UNITED KINGDOM
    • ASIA PACIFIC
    • MIDDLE EAST
    • AFRICA
    • CHINA
    • INDIA
    • JAPAN
    • AMERICAS
    • FRANCE
    • GERMANY
  • POLITICS
    • GOVERNMENT
    • UNITED STATES
    • US SUPREME COURT
  • TECH
    • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    • CYBERSECURITY
    • SPACE
    • DISRUPTED
  • COMMENTARY
  • BREAKINGVIEWS
    • BREAKINGVIEWS PREDICTIONS
  • MONEY
    • WEALTH
    • FUNDS
    • ETFS
  • LIFE
    • LIFESTYLE
    • SPORTS
    • SCIENCE
  • SECTORS
    • ENERGY
    • HEALTHCARE
    • MEDIA & TELECOM
    • SUSTAINABILITY
    • ENVIRONMENT
    • RETAIL & CONSUMER
    • AUTOS & TRANSPORTATION
    • AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE
Demonstrators rally on Cambridge Common in a protest organized by the City of Cambridge calling on Harvard leadership to resist interference at the university by the federal government in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S. April 12, 2025.   REUTERS/Nicholas Pfosi
Demonstrators rally on Cambridge Common in a protest organized by the City of Cambridge calling on Harvard leadership to resist interference at the university by the federal government in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S. April 12, 2025. REUTERS/Nicholas Pfosi
Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S., December 12, 2023. REUTERS/Brian Snyder/File Photo
Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S., December 12, 2023. REUTERS/Brian Snyder/File Photo
Home
Legal

Harvard professors sue over Trump's review of $9 billion in funding

April 12th, 2025 | 20:02 PM Legal 2

Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Pinterest

Worth reading...

US Supreme Court won't review assault weapon, high-capacity magazine bans
Judge denies US Copyright Office director's request to halt her firing
Ex-analyst sues Freepoint Commodities, alleges pressure to facilitate insider trading
How do you get to Carnegie Hall? Infringe its trademarks, lawsuit claims
By Nate Raymond

Harvard University professors are suing to block the Trump administration's review of nearly $9 billion in federal contracts and grants awarded to the Ivy League school as part of a crackdown on what it says is antisemitism on college campuses.

The Harvard faculty chapter of the American Association of University Professors and the national arm of the academic organization said in a lawsuit filed on Friday in a Boston federal court that the administration was trying to unlawfully undermine academic freedom and free speech on the school's campus.

The U.S. Department of Justice, which is defending the administration's policies in court, did not respond to a request for comment on Saturday. Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Harvard declined to comment.

Several elite universities including Harvard have seen their federal funding threatened by President Donald Trump's administration over pro-Palestinian campus protests as well as other issues such as diversity, equity and inclusion programs and transgender policies.

The U.S. Departments of Education and Health and Human Services along with the U.S. General Services Administration on March 31 said that $255.6 million in contracts between Harvard, its affiliates and the federal government were being reviewed, along with $8.7 billion in multi-year grant commitments.

In a subsequent letter, those agencies demanded Harvard meet numerous conditions to continue receiving federal funds, including banning the use of masks, eliminating DEI programs and agreeing to cooperate with law enforcement agencies.

Many pro-Palestinian protesters have worn masks during demonstrations. The letter also said Harvard must review and make changes to programs and departments that "fuel antisemitic harassment" and hold students accountable for policy violations.

The administration has cited its authority to enforce Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, an anti-discrimination law covering institutions that receive federal funding.

But the lawsuit alleged the administration had failed to follow the statute's requirements in seeking to cut off funding and that its actions violated free speech rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.

The plaintiffs alleged that the goal was to "impose on Harvard University political views and policy preferences advanced by the Trump administration and commit the university to punishing disfavored speech."

"The First Amendment does not permit government officials to use the power of their office to silence critics and suppress speech they don't like," Andrew Crespo, a Harvard law professor and general counsel to the school's AAUP chapter, said in a statement.

  • Topic
  • USA
  • LAWSUIT (PIX)
  • TRUMP/HARVARD
Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Pinterest
Previous article US Supreme Court won't review assault weapon, high-capacity magazine bans

Related Posts

Legal
June 2nd, 2025

US Supreme Court won't review assault weapon, high-capacity magazine ban...

Legal
May 28th, 2025

Judge denies US Copyright Office director's request to halt her firing

Legal
May 28th, 2025

Ex-analyst sues Freepoint Commodities, alleges pressure to facilitate in...

Legal
May 20th, 2025

How do you get to Carnegie Hall? Infringe its trademarks, lawsuit claims

Legal
May 20th, 2025

Massachusetts hacker to plead guilty to PowerSchool data breach

Legal
May 19th, 2025

US judge rejects Vanguard $40 million mutual fund settlement, cites SEC ...

The Wire
Aug 19th 6 h ago
Government

DOJ argues Comey novel shows he knew ‘86 47’ post was a thr...

Aug 19th 6 h ago
Business

Fed policymakers' inflation concerns increased at July meet...

Aug 19th 6 h ago
Sports

Swiss rider Poncini dies in Manx GP qualifying

Aug 19th 6 h ago
Business

Amazon plans drone delivery expansion to about 500 US local...

Aug 19th 6 h ago
Litigation

Abbott settles appeal over $495 million infant formula verd...

TRENDING ON FINANCETIME
Aug 19th, 2026 Sports

Mets' Jorge Polanco (ankle) to have season-ending surgery

Aug 19th, 2026 Sports

Reports: Phillies sign free agent LHP Nestor Cortes

Aug 19th, 2026 Business

US CFTC seeks comment on compute derivatives as AI demand grows

Aug 19th, 2026 Technology

Payments firm Stripe to buy AI developer platform OpenRouter

Aug 19th, 2026 Government

ABC says intimidation by Trump's FCC forced programming changes

Markets-Sectors
ENERGY -0.16%
FINANCIALS -0.62%

  • BUSINESS
  • MARKETS
  • WORLD
  • POLITICS
  • TECH
  • COMMENTARY
  • BREAKINGVIEWS
  • MONEY
  • LIFE
  • SECTORS
  • Back to top
FinanceTime
FinanceTime

World Business & Financial News, Breaking US & International News

Additional Services
  • Privacy-Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
© Financetime.org 2026. All rights reserved. Hosted by LeadsDeposit.com
Produced by C-iT