• BUSINESS
    • FINANCE
    • LEGAL
    • RETAIL & CONSUMER
    • AUTOS & TRANSPORTATION
    • HEALTHCARE & PHARMACEUTICALS
    • MEDIA & TELECOM
    • AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE
    • ENERGY
  • MARKETS
    • EUROPEAN MARKETS
    • ASIAN MARKETS
    • U.S. MARKETS
    • COMMODITIES
    • EMERGING MARKETS
    • DEALS
    • RATES & BONDS
  • WORLD
    • UNITED STATES
    • EUROPE
    • UNITED KINGDOM
    • ASIA PACIFIC
    • MIDDLE EAST
    • AFRICA
    • CHINA
    • INDIA
    • JAPAN
    • AMERICAS
    • FRANCE
    • GERMANY
  • POLITICS
    • GOVERNMENT
    • UNITED STATES
    • US SUPREME COURT
  • TECH
    • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    • CYBERSECURITY
    • SPACE
    • DISRUPTED
  • COMMENTARY
  • BREAKINGVIEWS
    • BREAKINGVIEWS PREDICTIONS
  • MONEY
    • WEALTH
    • FUNDS
    • ETFS
  • LIFE
    • LIFESTYLE
    • SPORTS
    • SCIENCE
  • SECTORS
    • ENERGY
    • HEALTHCARE
    • MEDIA & TELECOM
    • SUSTAINABILITY
    • ENVIRONMENT
    • RETAIL & CONSUMER
    • AUTOS & TRANSPORTATION
    • AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE
FinanceTime
  • August 20th, 2026

FinanceTimeFinancetime

  • BUSINESS
    • FINANCE
    • LEGAL
    • RETAIL & CONSUMER
    • AUTOS & TRANSPORTATION
    • HEALTHCARE & PHARMACEUTICALS
    • MEDIA & TELECOM
    • AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE
    • ENERGY
  • MARKETS
    • EUROPEAN MARKETS
    • ASIAN MARKETS
    • U.S. MARKETS
    • COMMODITIES
    • EMERGING MARKETS
    • DEALS
    • RATES & BONDS
  • WORLD
    • UNITED STATES
    • EUROPE
    • UNITED KINGDOM
    • ASIA PACIFIC
    • MIDDLE EAST
    • AFRICA
    • CHINA
    • INDIA
    • JAPAN
    • AMERICAS
    • FRANCE
    • GERMANY
  • POLITICS
    • GOVERNMENT
    • UNITED STATES
    • US SUPREME COURT
  • TECH
    • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    • CYBERSECURITY
    • SPACE
    • DISRUPTED
  • COMMENTARY
  • BREAKINGVIEWS
    • BREAKINGVIEWS PREDICTIONS
  • MONEY
    • WEALTH
    • FUNDS
    • ETFS
  • LIFE
    • LIFESTYLE
    • SPORTS
    • SCIENCE
  • SECTORS
    • ENERGY
    • HEALTHCARE
    • MEDIA & TELECOM
    • SUSTAINABILITY
    • ENVIRONMENT
    • RETAIL & CONSUMER
    • AUTOS & TRANSPORTATION
    • AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE
The U.S. Supreme Court building is seen the morning before justices are expected to issue opinions in pending cases, in Washington, U.S., June 14, 2024. Elizabeth Frantz
The U.S. Supreme Court building is seen the morning before justices are expected to issue opinions in pending cases, in Washington, U.S., June 14, 2024. Elizabeth Frantz
Home
Legal

US Supreme Court revives lawsuit against cop in fatal Houston shooting

May 15th, 2025 | 16:00 PM Legal 3

Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Pinterest

Worth reading...

US Supreme Court won't review assault weapon, high-capacity magazine bans
Judge denies US Copyright Office director's request to halt her firing
Ex-analyst sues Freepoint Commodities, alleges pressure to facilitate insider trading
How do you get to Carnegie Hall? Infringe its trademarks, lawsuit claims
By Andrew Chung

The U.S. Supreme Court revived on Thursday a Texas woman's civil rights lawsuit against a Houston police officer who fatally shot her son during a traffic stop.

The justices, in a 9-0 ruling authored by liberal Justice Elena Kagan, threw out a lower court's dismissal of the lawsuit by Janice Hughes accusing the officer, Roberto Felix Jr., of violating the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures by using deadly force against her son. Ashtian Barnes, 24, was killed in the 2016 incident.

The justices decided that the lower courts had impermissibly limited their review of the officer's actions leading up to the shooting.

"Today, we reject that approach as improperly narrowing the requisite Fourth Amendment analysis," Kagan wrote.

"To assess whether an officer acted reasonably in using force, a court must consider all the relevant circumstances, including facts and events leading up to the climactic moment," Kagan added.

The case tested whether lower courts should analyze police conduct by considering only the exact "moment of threat" to the officer, while excluding the officer's actions prior to the deadly episode - even by a few seconds.

Lower courts found that Felix's actions were reasonable, as they considered only the two seconds before the officer fired his first shot, when he was hanging onto the moving vehicle and believed his life was in danger.

The "moment of threat" doctrine is used by courts in several regions of the country, including the Texas federal courts overseen by the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, where this case was decided - but not in other federal courts, according to lawyers for Hughes.

Hughes sued the officer and Harris County, seeking monetary damages. A trial judge and then the 5th Circuit ruled against Hughes.

Felix, a Harris County Constable's Office traffic enforcement officer, pulled Barnes over on April 28, 2016, because the rented Toyota Corolla he was driving on a Houston highway had outstanding toll violations.

Barnes searched for his license and proof of insurance, and suggested they might be in the trunk, according to court papers. Felix claimed to smell marijuana, though no evidence of drugs was found in the car, the filings showed.

Felix ordered Barnes out of the vehicle, but instead the car began to move forward, according to court papers. Felix stepped on to the driver's door sill and shouted at Barnes not to move, then fired twice, the filings showed. Barnes died at the scene.

Local officials investigated the shooting but Felix was never charged with a crime. An internal police probe also cleared Felix of any wrongdoing, according to court papers.

The lawsuit alleged that the shooting resulted from Felix's dangerous decision "to pull his gun without provocation, then point that gun in Ashtian Barnes' direction, then leaping onto a moving vehicle and firing twice into it without warning, with no clue as to what he was aiming at."

Lawyers for Felix had argued against a ruling that would make it harder for police to defend their use of force - even if an officer made a mistake, used bad tactics or had poor planning.

During arguments before the Supreme Court in January, the justices seemed skeptical of the "moment of threat" doctrine, while some worried that a ruling against Felix would deter police from doing their jobs.

Conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch noted during the arguments that, even if courts may look at the totality of the circumstances of an incident involving police, officers are still protected by a powerful legal defense called qualified immunity.

  • Topic
  • USA
  • COURT/POLICE (UPDATE 1, PIX)
Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Pinterest
Next article Southwest Airlines likely to pay 1 cent to end DEI-related lawsuit

Related Posts

Legal
June 2nd, 2025

US Supreme Court won't review assault weapon, high-capacity magazine ban...

Legal
May 28th, 2025

Judge denies US Copyright Office director's request to halt her firing

Legal
May 28th, 2025

Ex-analyst sues Freepoint Commodities, alleges pressure to facilitate in...

Legal
May 20th, 2025

How do you get to Carnegie Hall? Infringe its trademarks, lawsuit claims

Legal
May 20th, 2025

Massachusetts hacker to plead guilty to PowerSchool data breach

Legal
May 19th, 2025

US judge rejects Vanguard $40 million mutual fund settlement, cites SEC ...

The Wire
Aug 20th 1 h ago
Media & Telecom

'Baby Shark' boy returns to stage as a K-pop singer

Aug 20th 1 h ago
Litigation

SK Hynix to pay 60% of employee bonuses in company stock un...

Aug 20th 2 h ago
Asia Pacific

Outsider who could decide New Zealand's next government wan...

Aug 20th 2 h ago
Business

Aegon raises share buyback plan to 350 million euros

Aug 20th 2 h ago
Africa

South Africa's Exxaro half-year profit down 20%, cuts divid...

TRENDING ON FINANCETIME
Aug 20th, 2026 Cricket

Australia look for response to 'Darwin Disaster' in second Bangladesh test

Aug 20th, 2026 World

Russia strikes drone component facilities, other targets in Kyiv, defence ministry says

Aug 20th, 2026 Asia Pacific

China's Shanghai eases housing policies to spur demand

Aug 20th, 2026 Boards, Policy & Regulation

Fortescue hires law firm to investigate sexual harassment allegations against senior executive

Aug 20th, 2026 Transactional

Treasury's upsized buybacks may complicate Fed's monetary policy work

Markets-Sectors
BASIC MATERIALS +1.43%
UTILITIES +0.00%

  • BUSINESS
  • MARKETS
  • WORLD
  • POLITICS
  • TECH
  • COMMENTARY
  • BREAKINGVIEWS
  • MONEY
  • LIFE
  • SECTORS
  • Back to top
FinanceTime
FinanceTime

World Business & Financial News, Breaking US & International News

Additional Services
  • Privacy-Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
© Financetime.org 2026. All rights reserved. Hosted by LeadsDeposit.com
Produced by C-iT