Walt Disney Co will ask a Florida judge on Friday to dismiss a lawsuit by a state oversight board as part of the entertainment giant's effort to pursue its case against Governor Ron DeSantis, the latest in a year-long feud between the two.
Disney wants Judge Margaret Schreiber in Orlando to dismiss a lawsuit filed in May by the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District, which controls development around the company's theme parks.
The lawsuit seeks to void "backroom deals" favorable to Disney that the district alleges were struck with a prior district board and in violation of state law.
At the same time, Disney is pursuing its own lawsuit filed in April against the governor in federal court that claims DeSantis "weaponized" state government against the company for attacking a law central to the governor's agenda.
DeSantis rallied lawmakers to pass bills that reconstituted the district, formerly known as Reedy Creek Improvement District, and transfer power over the board to the governor from Disney. Lawmakers also retroactively invalidated agreements that Disney reached with the prior board on the eve of it being brought under DeSantis's control.
Disney argued in court papers that the district's lawsuit should be dismissed because it was no longer needed since the company's agreements with the prior board were nullified by the state.
Such a ruling would allow the company to focus on its federal case, which claims DeSantis violated the company's constitutional right to free speech. Disney wants a federal court order preventing the state from enforcing the laws directed at the company. DeSantis has been dismissive of Disney's lawsuit and said the company has no right to operate without proper district government oversight or have special privileges.
The oversight district asked the state judge to allow its case to proceed. It argued that Disney's federal case will be largely undercut if the judge determines the Disney agreements with the prior board are invalid, because Disney will no longer have contracts that were unconstitutionally violated.
"If Disney's contracts are void, nearly all of Disney's claims in the federal case disappear," the district said in a court filing.
